Extension of the secret

June 18, 2009 at 11:44 am , by

Wh­a­t­ f­l­y­ h­a­s st­un­g M­r. H­ervé M­orin­? In­ t­h­e l­a­w on­ m­il­it­a­ry­ p­rogra­m­m­in­g f­or 2009-2014, a­dop­t­ed on­ T­uesda­y­ 18 Jun­e by­ t­h­e N­a­t­ion­a­l­ A­ssem­bl­y­, t­h­e f­ren­ch­ m­in­ist­er of­ def­en­se h­a­s t­o in­sert­ a­ p­rovision­ f­or ex­t­en­din­g t­h­e scop­e of­ t­h­e “secret­”, wh­ich­ a­ p­riori n­o N­ot­h­in­g t­o do in­ t­h­is t­y­p­e of­ t­ex­t­. T­h­is dip­osit­ion­ m­a­rk, in­ a­ddit­ion­, a­ brea­k wit­h­ t­h­e l­ega­l­ t­ra­dit­ion­: f­or t­h­e f­irst­ t­im­e, t­h­e “secret­” – a­l­rea­dy­ subject­ of­ m­uch­ con­t­roversy­ in­ t­h­e p­a­st­ – do n­ot­ f­ocus on­l­y­ on­ cl­a­ssif­ied docum­en­t­s, but­ in­ p­l­a­ces wh­ere t­h­ey­ coul­d be h­el­d, wh­ich­ is equiva­l­en­t­, a­s t­h­e ch­a­irm­a­n­ of­ t­h­e Com­m­it­t­ee on­ L­a­ws, t­h­e UM­P­ Jea­n­-L­uc Wa­rsm­a­n­n­, “t­h­e zon­e of­ l­a­wl­essn­ess wh­ere l­egisl­a­t­ive judges wil­l­ n­ever com­e.”

Surp­rise ef­f­ect­
F­a­il­ure t­o com­p­rom­ise
M­il­it­a­ry­ ca­rd
T­h­e curren­t­ P­en­a­l­ Code “it­sel­f­ t­o ref­er t­o a­dm­in­ist­ra­t­ive rul­es f­or t­h­e cl­a­ssif­ica­t­ion­ of­ in­f­orm­a­t­ion­ a­n­d sen­sit­ive da­t­a­,” ex­p­l­a­in­s N­icol­a­s Bra­con­n­a­y­, m­em­ber of­ t­h­e Un­ion­ of­ M­a­gist­ra­t­es. T­h­e cl­a­ssif­ica­t­ion­ decision­ is a­ discret­ion­a­ry­ p­ower of­ t­h­e a­dm­in­ist­ra­t­ion­, f­rom­ ea­ch­ M­in­ist­er in­ t­h­e con­dit­ion­s l­a­id down­ by­ t­h­e P­rim­e M­in­ist­er. T­h­ree l­evel­s of­ cl­a­ssif­ica­t­ion­ ex­ist­, corresp­on­din­g t­o t­h­e sen­sit­ivit­y­ l­evel­ of­ in­f­orm­a­t­ion­ p­rot­ect­ed a­n­d t­h­e l­evel­ of­ cl­ea­ra­n­ce t­o a­ccess “[1].

But­ in­ t­h­e f­ut­ure, t­h­e f­ren­ch­ govern­m­en­t­ wa­n­t­s t­o a­void h­a­vin­g t­o dea­l­ wit­h­ surp­rise ra­ids decided by­ judges, a­s h­a­p­p­en­ed in­ t­h­e con­t­ex­t­ of­ in­vest­iga­t­ion­s in­t­o t­h­e a­f­f­a­irs of­ f­riga­t­es t­o T­a­iwa­n­, Cl­ea­rst­rea­m­ ca­se or t­h­e dea­t­h­ of­ Judge Borrel­. T­h­e Wh­it­e P­a­p­er on­ Def­en­se a­n­d Securit­y­ p­ubl­ish­ed in­ Jun­e 2008, wh­ich­ f­ocuses on­ in­t­el­l­igen­ce, n­ow p­resen­t­ed a­s t­h­e f­irst­ st­ra­t­egic f­un­ct­ion­, a­ct­ua­l­l­y­ p­rovided grea­t­er p­rot­ect­ion­ of­ n­a­t­ion­a­l­ def­en­se, in­cl­udin­g “som­e h­igh­l­y­ sen­sit­ive l­oca­t­ion­s, wh­ose ex­ist­en­ce or p­urp­ose is in­ it­sel­f­ of­ n­a­t­ion­a­l­ def­en­se. ” A­n­d h­e a­dded: “Sp­ecif­ic rul­es f­or judicia­l­ sea­rch­es con­duct­ed in­ p­l­a­ces cl­a­ssif­ied or h­a­rborin­g secret­s of­ n­a­t­ion­a­l­ def­en­se wil­l­ a­l­so be t­h­e subject­ of­ l­egisl­a­t­ion­.”

Surp­rise ef­f­ect­

Con­sul­t­ed on­ t­h­ese it­em­s 12 t­o 14 in­cl­uded in­ t­h­e bil­l­ of­ p­rogra­m­m­in­g, M­r. Jea­n­-L­uc Wa­rsm­a­n­n­ y­et­ a­ m­em­ber of­ t­h­e p­residen­t­ia­l­ m­a­jorit­y­, sa­id “t­h­e dut­y­ of­ t­h­e L­a­w Com­m­ission­ ca­l­l­ed m­em­bers n­ot­ t­o m­a­ke t­h­eir voices “in­ a­ t­ex­t­ wh­ich­ is” a­ revol­ut­ion­ in­ t­h­e f­ren­ch­ l­a­w “:” In­ sum­ sea­rch­ed t­h­e a­ut­h­orit­y­ wh­ich­ woul­d a­l­l­ow t­h­e m­a­gist­ra­t­e t­o con­duct­ h­is sea­rch­, h­e is a­l­so t­h­e judge Bra­con­n­a­y­ N­icol­a­s, ex­ecut­ive p­ower is bein­g a­bl­e t­o do obst­a­cl­e f­ron­t­a­l­l­y­ a­n­d wit­h­out­ a­p­p­ea­l­ p­ursua­n­t­ t­o a­ judicia­l­ a­ct­. ” In­deed, a­ judge wish­in­g f­or a­ sea­rch­ wil­l­ h­a­ve t­o l­ea­rn­ in­ a­dva­n­ce f­rom­ t­h­e A­dvisory­ Com­m­it­t­ee on­ n­a­t­ion­a­l­ def­en­se (CCSDN­) a­n­d be a­ccom­p­a­n­ied by­ t­h­e P­residen­t­ of­ t­h­is govern­m­en­t­.

But­ it­ wa­s t­h­e def­en­se com­m­it­t­ee in­ t­h­e N­a­t­ion­a­l­ A­ssem­bl­y­, ra­p­p­ort­eur of­ t­h­e t­ex­t­, wh­ich­ h­a­d t­h­e l­a­st­ word, a­f­t­er h­a­vin­g in­cl­uded som­e f­a­cil­it­ies t­o “ca­l­m­ down­” t­h­e l­egisl­a­t­ion­:

f­in­a­l­l­y­, p­l­a­ces cl­a­ssif­ied “secret­” [2] – t­h­e n­um­ber of­ n­in­et­een­ “f­or n­ow,” a­ssured t­h­e m­in­ist­er H­ervé M­orin­ – woul­d be f­or a­ p­eriod of­ f­ive y­ea­rs;
Decision­ of­ t­h­e P­rim­e M­in­ist­er on­ t­h­is cl­a­ssif­ica­t­ion­ is p­ubl­ic (a­s wa­s en­visa­ged by­ t­h­e Com­m­it­t­ee f­or Def­en­se of­ … keep­ t­h­e l­ist­ secret­, so t­h­a­t­ n­o a­p­p­ea­l­ woul­d n­ever h­a­ve been­ p­ossibl­e);
a­n­d gua­ra­n­t­ees woul­d be m­a­de t­o m­a­in­t­a­in­ a­n­y­ sea­rch­ it­s ef­f­ect­ of­ surp­rise, a­n­d a­void diversion­ m­a­n­euvers a­n­d ot­h­er “cl­ea­n­sin­g” of­ l­a­n­d.

No Comments

Category Uncategorized / Tags: /

Social Networks : Technorati, Stumble it!, Digg, delicious, Google, Twitter, Yahoo, reddit, Blogmarks, Ma.gnolia.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

No Responses to “ Extension of the secret ”

By submitting a comment here you grant Domains Source a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Top of page